... | ... | @@ -27,12 +27,11 @@ Pros: |
|
|
* Larger community, more options for page layouts, extensions, etc.
|
|
|
* Easier to use from a content perspective, built-in Gutenberg support, several mature page builders.
|
|
|
* Lower ongoing upgrade costs and lower longer term maintenance costs.
|
|
|
* Any improvements made will support Wordpress functionality parity with Drupal 7.
|
|
|
* Larger .
|
|
|
* Any improvements made will support Wordpress functionality parity with Drupal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* We will need WP developers to help porting over our custom code.
|
|
|
* No 'Views' integration with CiviCRM. There are not that many, but it is probably the biggest argument against WordPress.
|
|
|
* Content migration path will require much more work. There aren't many tools available, or they must be evaluated/tested/purchased.
|
|
|
* Content migration may be more difficult (though [tools](https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-all-import/) do exist that may make this a non-issue)
|
|
|
* Higher security risk. Will likely need different measures in place. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |