@DaveD I see the bug in 5.69 so there might be some caching or something in play - tracing through the code this hook call is 'to blame' - but I don't see any recent change there
Oh it's not caching it's that Dave should look at a site that actually has civigrant enabled when testing something about civigrant. Yes it's there in 5.69 too. So it's possible this has been around since it became an ext. I see it's there it's 5.63 too, so will remove tag.
Thank you for raising an issue to help improve CiviCRM. As you may know, this issue has not had any activity for quite some time, so we have closed it.
We would like you to help us to determine if this issue should be re-opened:
If this issue was reporting a bug, can you attempt to reproduce it on a latest version of CiviCRM?
If this issue was proposing a new feature, can you verify if the feature proposal is still relevant? Did it get the concept-approved label? Have other people also shown interest? Could it be implemented as an extension?
If the answer to either question is yes, please feel free to comment or re-open the issue. Please also consider:
Is it something that you could help implement, either by sending a patch or hiring someone who can?
Thank you for your help and contributions to CiviCRM.
P.S. This is an automated message, see infra/gitlab issue 20. We understand that automatic responses are annoying, but given the number of open issues as the project evolves, we need a bit of help to triage and prioritise the most relevant issues.
Thank you for raising an issue to help improve CiviCRM. As you may know, this issue has not had any activity for the past 30 days.
We would like you to help us to move this issue forward:
If this issue was reporting a bug, can you attempt to reproduce it on a latest version of CiviCRM?
If this issue was proposing a new feature, can you verify if the feature proposal is still relevant? Did it get the concept-approved label? Have other people also shown interest? Could it be implemented as an extension?
If the answer to either question is yes, please feel free to comment. Please also consider:
Is it something that you could help implement, either by sending a patch or hiring someone who can?
Thank you for your help and contributions to CiviCRM.
P.S. This is an automated message, see infra/gitlab issue 47. We understand that automatic responses are annoying, but given the number of open issues as the project evolves, we need a bit of help to triage and prioritise the most relevant issues.