Community Council content rights
The Community Council is elected to assist with governance of CiviCRM. https://civicrm.org is a crucial communications hub for the ecosystem. The CC would like to have two people able to edit Community Council content so there is an ability to share tasks and provide continuity.
There are only a very small number of posts/nodes that this permission is needed for. As responsible members of the community entrusted with its oversight they are reliable.
There have been efforts undertaken and maintained to limit the number of people with edit access on c.o. This is a good thing as it helps prevent problems, often inadvertent, and ensure there is knowledge of who is doing what.
It can be difficult to manage a rotating crew of users and their perms, and there is very little in the way of superadmin time for this.
I haven't got a sense of the existing roles, or the options for content moderation with the existing setup.
Options:
- Assign people to existing roles that have more permissions than required for this job.
- requires trust they won't mess things up, sets precedent of users getting extra perms for (laudable) special purpose
- Create a new role that has appropriate permissions, perhaps after installing software.
- adds complications, no budget, sets precedent of special setup for (laudable) special purpose
In both cases, periodic updates will be required, perhaps a user per year. There is a risk that more users end up getting the access, or the access is not withdrawn in a timely way eg after defeat in an election.