See: #64 (closed)
Merge details
This might be the fix but something in me tells me there is a more elegant solution possible. I will have a look at another time at this
ps. My personal opinion is that under the hood the data processor extension is too complex.
I agree. I was not sure how to approach this. Since custom fields have their own specification, I almost went for a new aggregation custom fields specification, however that seemed over kill for modifying one string.
Fixed with another fix. One was by using the function getName
in AggregateFunctionFieldSpecification::convertFromFieldSpecification
And the other fix was an issue with name the subquery data flow in the contribution data source.
closed
Fantastic!