- Nov 27, 2019
-
-
Seamus Lee authored
[TEST] #1366 Unit test for case audit
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
Fix api Payment.create to support overpayments
-
bgm authored
CSV Export: Add deprecation warning
-
Seamus Lee authored
dev/core1329 Reduce number of deceased contacts in the demo data from…
-
Seamus Lee authored
Limit number of deceased contacts to 4 and add in age checks as per Justin
-
- Nov 26, 2019
-
-
Seamus Lee authored
#1366 - Make case activity audit print report work again
-
Seamus Lee authored
Fix potential test glitch when repeatedly calling createLoggedInUser
-
colemanw authored
-
Seamus Lee authored
[REF] Remove unused parameter
-
- Nov 25, 2019
-
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
5.20
-
eileen authored
This parameter is always TRUE so it adds no value, removing
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
#1046 Status check for external case xml files
-
colemanw authored
Remove unused parameter
-
Seamus Lee authored
Fix deprecation warning on Price Set report
-
Seamus Lee authored
Rename activity search field from status_id to activity_status_id
-
bgm authored
[REF] CSV Export: Remove impossible checks on var
-
DaveD authored
-
colemanw authored
Remove unused functions
-
yashodha authored
Remove join to civicrm_option_value in favour of using getLabel funct…
-
colemanw authored
These functions are no longer needed now that KAM is merged into core.
-
Monish Deb authored
-
Monish Deb authored
-
Monish Deb authored
[REF] Further cleanup on address handling in merge code.
-
Monish Deb authored
Enable Case search metadata on Advanced Search Form
-
eileen authored
This variable is hard-coded to a double quote so checks to see if it is a single quote will never be true. I've checked this pretty thoroughly & I think the removed IFs are dead code
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
#560 Replace instances of CRM_Core_Error::fatal with Exceptio…
-
eileen authored
There are 3 calls to writeCSVFile - none of them pass in saveFile so it can be removed
-
eileen authored
In 5.20 we added a deprecation warning on searches that are borked WRT filling the prev_next cache & hence doing searches. The price set search falls into this camp & while it has been broken forever the deprecation notice is new (& the fix is safe) so targettin 5.20
-
eileen authored
On digging into this export function I cannot find any way to access these lines. If no-one else can spot a way I propose adding a deprecation notice & later removing
-
Seamus Lee authored
-
eileen authored
This is a follow on from https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/15949 This doesn't make any change - it just improves legibility
-
Seamus Lee authored
#560 Replace instances of CRM_Core_Error::fatal with Exceptions or Status bounces in SMS processing and appropriately handle error after
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
[REF] Minor code cleanup on the setting of contact greetings.
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
Sort CMS Database Table list
-
Eileen McNaughton authored
[UI] Ensure that when sorting on columns in the find activity search …
-
- Nov 24, 2019
-
-
eileen authored
I'm trying to review https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/15725 but through no fault of that PR it hits on one of the parts of the Export code that I still find unreadable :-( This is a further readability fix & it starts to point me to how to get past the underlying WTF about this code. Note that I removed the IF around sharedAddress. From Monish's PR I found out that we have a fairly long-standing regression where the sharedAddress code doesn't actually work :-( so I'm comfortable this won't break anything :-). We also have good test cover on this chunk from probably around when the shared address part got broken.... Looking in the UI there is no implication that the greeting for a shared address would display differently - which is the only explanation I can think of for different handling here. Of course until we remove the later IF the shared address would do things differently - erm if it worked. ALl of which is a long way of saying the removal of the IF won't change anything
-
eileen authored
Currently this is on the form as 'status_id' but as soon as it's submitted the value is renamed - I think we might not even need to change the smart group for this one. The other field that is being renamed is 'priority_id'. Unless we have an appetite to add a uniqueName for this field (which I kind of feel like not doing more of for some cycles), I think we could stop renaming it & rely on the default where handling for the where clause. From what I can see the reason for prefixing is not about uniqueness but rather about adding a prefix so it gets handled by Activity_BAO_Query - but in fact Contact_BAO_Query should handle it just fine based on metadata
-
magnolia61 authored
-