Community issueshttps://lab.civicrm.org/groups/community/-/issues2020-03-27T03:31:42Zhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/17Membership price points2020-03-27T03:31:42Zphillipm2001Membership price pointsMy organisation would like to set up organisational memberships. It would be good to have bronze, silver and gold memberships see this website for an example https://www.and.org.au/pages/membership-packages.html. I would like to know how...My organisation would like to set up organisational memberships. It would be good to have bronze, silver and gold memberships see this website for an example https://www.and.org.au/pages/membership-packages.html. I would like to know how to do this in Civi. I would also like to know how to use payment processors such as Stripe and Paypal.
https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/16Civicrm Training2020-03-27T03:31:42Zphillipm2001Civicrm TrainingThere is a lack of training in Civicrm. I have done some training with Cividesk in Denver, Colorado. But I need to get up at 3am in the morning and that is very hard.There is a lack of training in Civicrm. I have done some training with Cividesk in Denver, Colorado. But I need to get up at 3am in the morning and that is very hard.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/20Installer should ask analytics-related questions2020-02-27T01:42:06ZJonGoldInstaller should ask analytics-related questionsIt looks like there's a plan underway to make the 2019 installer the standard installer: See https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/issues/1615.
Several years ago, we discussed adding additional installer questions to improve our communicatio...It looks like there's a plan underway to make the 2019 installer the standard installer: See https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/issues/1615.
Several years ago, we discussed adding additional installer questions to improve our communications/analytics. If we're rolling out a new installer, let's reopen discussion.
Proposals I recall are checkboxes for the following:
* Allow signing up for CiviCRM newsletter (aka "get added to c.o/civicrm") from the install screen.
* Allow collecting the Default Organization data for similar purposes.
* It's OK to contact the evaluator for assistance with evaluation.
* There was also discussion of a field, hidden from the UI, that indicated that the installer was managed by a partner (and an optional field for the installer's name). This would allow us to a) get a sense of how many sites are being implemented by partners, b) in-app communication could be tailored based on whether a partner is involved.
Some of this got bogged down in, "Oh, it's not fair if one shop hogs all the evaluation calls" - but honestly, 5 years later that feels like the least of our concerns. We should implement whichever of these feels uncontroversial.
I'll also propose:
* Contact me if we have an unpatched security issue.
@joshhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/24api feature request for usability: filter out deleted contacts unless is_dele...2020-02-04T21:03:41Zndavisapi feature request for usability: filter out deleted contacts unless is_deleted = 1 in parametersThe title says it all... when pulling a contact by email, I should only get undeleted contacts. This is painful when something works fine on dev then you move it to stage, with a much bigger dataset that includes billions of deleted cont...The title says it all... when pulling a contact by email, I should only get undeleted contacts. This is painful when something works fine on dev then you move it to stage, with a much bigger dataset that includes billions of deleted contacts, and everything breaks.
"where is_deleted=0" should be a part of all api calls unless you specifically indicate that you want deleted stuff.
```
$result = civicrm_api3('Email', 'get', [
'sequential' => 1,
'email' => "someuser@somedomain.org",
'api.Contact.get' => [],
]);
```
returns all contacts with that email attached. By default it should only include contacts that aren't deleted.
Just a suggestion! No one is interested in deleted contacts unless they're removing them permanently or undeleting them.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/19Valuing support for CiviCRM2023-02-06T14:38:51Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgValuing support for CiviCRMThere are 2 primary ways to support CiviCRM: in-kind contributions and financial support. There is a third way that the project is supported that we may also discuss below: earned income generated by the core team itself.
Over the past ...There are 2 primary ways to support CiviCRM: in-kind contributions and financial support. There is a third way that the project is supported that we may also discuss below: earned income generated by the core team itself.
Over the past several years, we’ve tried to promote both through programs such as the partner program, make it happen campaigns, and the contributor log. At a certain point we started to equate the two in order to influence the sorting of the “experts” listing at https://civicrm.org/experts.
The result has been interesting. This issue is intended to reflect on the challenges of “valuing” support in order to provide a path forward.
To be clear, this issue is not going to address the motives behind supporting CiviCRM, rather it will focus on how it’s done currently and what the underlying intentions are for doing it the way we currently do.
-------
Let’s start with the basics: *financial support given directly to the Core Team in order to support the general operations of the Core Team. As an end user, provider, or individual, you can donate to the Core Team.* You receive a thank you and some recognition, and that’s about it.
Some supporters, such as CiviCRM partners, give partner dues to support the Core Team and receive recognition by being listed on the experts listing. The amount given (used to) affects the sorting of the list. You give more, you rank higher. Likewise, if you also give the random donation, that too affects your ranking.
You could also sponsor an event. As a non-partner, you receive recognition over the course of the event. As a partner, you receive recognition over the course of the event AND the amount donated affects the sorting of the experts listing. Again, you give partner dues and now event sponsorship… the amount you give moves you up the list.
Anybody can give to a make it happen campaign. Let’s assume that this campaign is Form Builder and it’s being built by the Core Team. So, you give and the financial support comes directly to the Core Team earmarked for Form Builder. As an individual or end user or a non-partner, you get a thank you and recognition on the Form Builder campaign page. As a partner, you get recognition on the Form Builder page and, once again, your donation influences your position on the experts listing.
All of this is pretty straightforward, even if it’s not perfectly fair. It’s easy to understand and consistent. But, now let’s get into more complex scenarios.
Imagine you are a partner and you run a make it happen campaign for an important extension that is used throughout the community. The MIH campaign completes and the money flows through CiviCRM to you so that you can build the extension. For the sake of simplicity, suppose that the donation came from one source, another CiviCRM partner. Do they receive the same benefit as if the money came directly to the Core Team (i.e. a boost to their listing)? What if the extension isn’t widely used? Should they still receive a benefit?
Imagine that you are a CiviCRM partner and you have a large client that is funding a lot of bug fixes. You want a vacation, so you contract the Core Team to fix all these bugs for a fee. They’re in core after all. So, in essence, you’re paying the Core Team to fix bugs that benefit everybody. Or is your client? Do you get the benefit to your listing? Or does the client get recognition somehow?
Imagine that you’re a CiviCRM partner and you aren’t a developer. You land a job to develop an extension and you contract with another CiviCRM partner to build the extension. It’s a new extension that could be valuable, but who knows? Maybe it will be well adopted, maybe not. No money comes into the Core Team whatsoever. Do you get credit for the amount you pay to the actual extension developer?
Take all off of these examples, and more, and now consider that different developers charge/make different amounts of money and/or are subject to different rates as a result of the cost of labor in their region or due to exchange rates. How do we account for what is actually paid without incurring serious overhead?
### Now let’s factor in in-kind support. It’s about to get really painful, but bear with me.
Back to the basics: you fix a bug in CiviCRM or respond to a question on Stack Exchange without any expectation of compensation or material benefit to you. It takes you one hour. You log your time.
If you’re not a consistent contributor and you’re anybody other than a CiviCRM partner, you might get a thank you and some sort of recognition. You might not. If you’re a consistent contributor or a partner and you log your time, that hour of time will be equated in dollar terms and will, therefore, influence your ranking on the experts listing.
That seems reasonable. You give time. Time is money. So, it’s kinda like you’re giving money. And, as we’ve seen, the more money you give to the project, the more it influences your position on the experts listing.
Imagine though that you develop a new extension completely on your own dime and roll it out to the community. It’s broadly useful, but not widely adopted. Can you claim the time you spent as a contribution? Or do you have to wait until it’s more widely adopted? What if other extensions which are much more edge-case have greater adoption? Can they claim their time even though their extension really only will ever benefit a very small number of potential CiviCRM users?
Suppose you employ several developers and you allocate 10 hours a month toward fixing bugs in core. Of course, your developers don’t work for free… you have to pay them. Can they claim contributor hours? Can you, as their employer? What if they’re not employees? What if they’re other partners? Or can you only claim what you paid as a financial contribution?
Suppose you fix a bug that benefits your client. You have a fixed priced contract with them each month, regardless of how many fixes you address. This latest one has broad impact. Can you claim it as a contribution even though you received compensation, though not specifically for the fix?
## Let’s put it together…
Suppose your pay to attend the NTEN conference on behalf of CiviCRM. You and an employee staff the booth for 8 hours and, along the way, manage to secure one new client that wants you to build a new extension that, ultimately, you have to have another partner build. Can you include what you pay to be at NTEN as a donation to CiviCRM? Can you include your time as a contribution to CiviCRM? Can you include your staff’s time? Can you include what you pay to the other partner that’s building the extension as a financial donation?
This is just one example, and as ridiculous as it sounds, it’s more common than you might think.
## Why are we asking anyway?
Because:
1. The experts listing matters. It is a significant driver of business. And, like Google search results, being at the top is valuable. So;
2. Ranking financial support seems like a reasonable way to promote those that give more. But, giving can come in the form of in-kind contributions. And;
3. Valuing contributions, or contributors, seems like not only an important thing, but the right thing to do. Naturally, we want contributors to grow and thrive and, you guessed it, become partners. Because;
4. The Core Team wants to grow its budget in order to bring new developments, like Form Builder, APIv4, and others online. So that;
5. CiviCRM continues to be a powerful, open source CRM that any organization, regardless of size, budget or focus can have access to.
So, the question we have is, how do we improve the way we recognize and value all forms of support to CiviCRM such that the project is not only sustainable, but that is thrives and ultimately achieves its mission?
-------
Related issues
- [Improve the contributor log](https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/issues/19)
- [Improve the experts listing](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/civicrm-website/issues/158)
- [Revise Partner Program](https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/issues/6)
- [Soft credit calculation](https://lab.civicrm.org/infra/ops/issues/799)
- [Tracking contributions](https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/wikis/Tracking-Contributions)https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/15Conversion Tracking with Google Ads2021-01-18T09:29:57Zdavid.hohmConversion Tracking with Google AdsMy organisation got accepted for the Google Ads Grant. There are several benefits that we can unlock if we are able to set up conversions.
I am trying to get my head around how this would work with civicrm and have not had much luck with...My organisation got accepted for the Google Ads Grant. There are several benefits that we can unlock if we are able to set up conversions.
I am trying to get my head around how this would work with civicrm and have not had much luck with an online search.
I'm trying to understand how one would set up the tracking code on the thank you pages since civicrm's thank you pages are automatically and dynamically generated. I'm therefore not sure where one would place the conversion tracking code.
Has anyone here worked out how to achieve conversion tracking with Civicrm?
sorry for the many questions. Just slowly chipping away at features on our wishlist and coming across questions as we tackle them,
Thanks for help here, it has been really appreciated.
cheers,
Davidhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/14notification of failed payment2020-03-27T03:31:41Zdavid.hohmnotification of failed paymentHi everyone,
is there a way to get a notification of some kind for when a recurring payment hasn't gone through? Maybe with membership rules?
We've had it a couple of times now that payments haven't gone through for insufficient funds f...Hi everyone,
is there a way to get a notification of some kind for when a recurring payment hasn't gone through? Maybe with membership rules?
We've had it a couple of times now that payments haven't gone through for insufficient funds for example and we only find out about it by chance a few days later.
thanks again for your help,
Davidhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/19Improve the process of capturing and recognizing contributions and contributo...2021-03-18T08:36:07Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgImprove the process of capturing and recognizing contributions and contributors, aka the contributor logThe contributor log migrated to Gitlab on 15 August 2019. Some stats on its uptake can be found [here](https://civicrm.org/blog/josh/contributing-to-civicrm-where-are-we-at). This issue is open to discuss how to improve the contributor l...The contributor log migrated to Gitlab on 15 August 2019. Some stats on its uptake can be found [here](https://civicrm.org/blog/josh/contributing-to-civicrm-where-are-we-at). This issue is open to discuss how to improve the contributor log (i.e. how contributions are recorded, what contributions should be recorded, etc.), as well as how we recognize contributors. Example suggestions:
- Kill it altogether!
- Have a separate list for contributors and for financial supporters
- Increase the value of contributions to have a greater impact on the current listing
- Etc.
Related issues & information:
- [How to track contributions](https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/wikis/Tracking-Contributions)
- [Improve the experts listing](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/civicrm-website/issues/158)
- [How the expert listing functions](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/civicrm-website/wikis/Experts-Listing)
- [Partners missing contributor badges](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/civicrm-website/issues/172)joshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/23Proposal: Simplified alternate logging setup using MariaDB Temporal tables2019-11-20T00:20:25ZlolcodeProposal: Simplified alternate logging setup using MariaDB Temporal tablesWe are experimenting with [MariaDB temporal tables](https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/temporal-data-tables/) for time stamped data extraction jobs. They make detecting record level updates easy and pass that off to the DB engine.
I woul...We are experimenting with [MariaDB temporal tables](https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/temporal-data-tables/) for time stamped data extraction jobs. They make detecting record level updates easy and pass that off to the DB engine.
I would like to propose an alternate method of CiviCRM logging that just enables the MariaDB standard temporal columns and SYSTEM VERSIONING. This logging option would be available if the DB is on MariaDB 10.3 or later. This would remove the need for the triggers.
This should start out as an extension.
Core changes needed to get feature parity with the current method: The "last updated by" column would move from the log_civicrm_xxx schema into the main table (currently is log_user_id).https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/18Consider Loomio for certain community decisions/discussions?2021-04-03T09:57:08ZnicolConsider Loomio for certain community decisions/discussions?Unlike other web voting systems which try to settle decisions only via a total number of votes, Loomio was born out of the consensus-decision-making systems used by its developer, New Zealand's [Enspiral](https://enspiral.com/). In conse...Unlike other web voting systems which try to settle decisions only via a total number of votes, Loomio was born out of the consensus-decision-making systems used by its developer, New Zealand's [Enspiral](https://enspiral.com/). In consensus-led decision-making, the goal is to get as many people on board with a decision as possible (the details vary - in some instances, everyone must agree, in others, it needs to be a high percentage, in others just a majority, but with no blocks). As a result, as a voting system, it introduces a few key ideas with which you can structure polls: you can abstain, you can change your vote, seek clarification, and offer the ability to 'block' - and discussion is threaded throughout the voting process.
Anyway, I noticed that Version 2.0 has [just come out](https://blog.loomio.org/2019/09/18/what-is-new-in-loomio-2.0-and-beta-release/?utm_campaign=whats-new-2.0-social&utm_term=social) and thought, given the wider question of bringing more community participation into CiviCRM decision-making, as well as the question of how people who can't/won't/shouldn't fly around the world to summits can ensure their voice is heard, is it something we should be exploring for CiviCRM's bigger questions? (such as CIVICRM vs civicrm vs Civicrm vs CiviCRM :)
It's FLOSS, and while there isn't LDAP yet so it could integrate seamlessly with Gitlab and Matter, there does seem to be [a fair amount of demand](https://www.loomio.org/d/AF8Xb0c6/ldap-authentication-way-past-due) for that. Also, FWIW and IMHO, a Loomio/CiviCRM bridge would be pretty app[ealing for any membership organisation trying to increase governance/participation.
![image](/uploads/55fa50bc51d1107d960faefed13c3064/image.png)
Version 2 also lets you schedule meeting/call times:
![image](/uploads/03fc2ec43ee1a26d64b588989d9e7066/image.png)https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/sydney-meetups/-/issues/2Can we use 'plus' addressing in CiviCRM to solve the problem of contacts shar...2019-11-14T03:13:14ZMickCCan we use 'plus' addressing in CiviCRM to solve the problem of contacts sharing email addresses?This was a suggestion by Wayne at the meetup for the problem of 2 contacts sharing the same email address
Solution - use 'plus' addressing
e.g smithfamily@gmail.com ios used by John and Mary
- Change emails respectively to smithfamily+j...This was a suggestion by Wayne at the meetup for the problem of 2 contacts sharing the same email address
Solution - use 'plus' addressing
e.g smithfamily@gmail.com ios used by John and Mary
- Change emails respectively to smithfamily+john@gmail and smithfamily+mary@gmail
- CiviCRM will see these email addresses as unique, but the emails will both be received by the original email.
- NOTE - I think that CiviCRM will send the email twice - if that's not a UX problem, then this is an adequate solution
Optionally, you could also add a Household record for both contacts, and add the original email there.
Do all major email providers support 'plus' addressing?
Microsoft Outlook will also support it according to this article
https://www.ghacks.net/2013/09/17/can-now-use-email-aliases-outlook-com/
All of the above can be validated through testing.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/18Partner Sales Funnel2020-02-26T15:06:18Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgPartner Sales FunnelThe CiviCRM Core Team is contacted from time to time by end users seeking guidance on implementing CiviCRM. Potential projects range in size from the very small to the very large. Where possible, the CT attempts to qualify the leads and ...The CiviCRM Core Team is contacted from time to time by end users seeking guidance on implementing CiviCRM. Potential projects range in size from the very small to the very large. Where possible, the CT attempts to qualify the leads and refer them either directly to the partner list (happens most often) or to specific partners therein (happens probably 6 times a year).
The idea of a sales funnel has been discussed in the past, however no consensus has been reached regarding how to do it in an equitable, efficient manner.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/17Implement community survey 20212021-03-18T13:18:56Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgImplement community survey 2021Implement a community survey/process
Survey the community to help frame medium term product roadmap.
Focus on end users (maybe, maybe separate questions for others)
Determine if it is possible to do a multilingual one.
Current task li...Implement a community survey/process
Survey the community to help frame medium term product roadmap.
Focus on end users (maybe, maybe separate questions for others)
Determine if it is possible to do a multilingual one.
Current task list (I didn't have perm to edit @aiden's comment)
* [x] @aiden: first draft of focused set of survey Qs
* [x] @JoeMurray: define ask for community input to survey design and share
* [x] @JoeMurray: get Aiden dev access to Wiki project
* [x] @JoeMurray : ask @daniella for help with getting help from Royal Statistical Society
* [x] @JoeMurray : ask RSS for help
* [x] @JoeMurray: invite Phil to join survey design effort
* [x] @JoeMurray : ask for access to old survey results/questions #21
* [x] @JoeMurray : ask @bgm for advice on how we would get access to setup survey on c.o, send mailings, etc. https://lab.civicrm.org/infra/community-messages/-/issues/1
* [x] @JoeMurray : ask Royal Stats Society for help via filling out form and returning
* [x] @Detlev : ask Alejandros to help translate into Spanish
* [ ] @josh: clean Civi.org Members records
Wiki page about this effort: https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/wikis/User-Survey-2021
----
Previous description focussed on member survey:
to determine opportunities to improve program success. Ideas/objectives include:
- understanding why the member joined in the first place, i.e. is it just goodwill or is there value that they would like to get out of it.
- whether they use a provider or manage civicrm in house
- how many organization users use civicrm
- do they have adequate training resources
- whether they would rather restrict their financial support to a specific fund, MIH or purpose
- link to register with sitejoshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/22Create in-app tabbed dashboard2020-07-27T16:49:41Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgCreate in-app tabbed dashboardThis is a proposal to maintain the current user configurable dashboard, but to add in:
1. a community dashboard that pulls relevant content from various sources and whose objective is to better organize content (examples https://lab.civ...This is a proposal to maintain the current user configurable dashboard, but to add in:
1. a community dashboard that pulls relevant content from various sources and whose objective is to better organize content (examples https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/civicrm-website/issues/159 and https://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/issues/21) and increase community engagement.
2. a changelog that feeds in issues from Gitlab, thereby replacing the release notes and potentially offering an easier way in-app to [file a bug report or request a feature](https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/issues/1356)
![community-dashboard-v2](/uploads/8c0d451e98aa0c0cd5d34aa1a1936e67/community-dashboard-v2.png)https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/17Make the tracking contributions page more discoverable and clearer2021-03-11T10:17:42ZRichMake the tracking contributions page more discoverable and clearerSearching lab for:
- log hours
- time logging
- logging spent time
- record time
- record contributed hours
Reveals nothing. Google is not even pretending to be your friend either. I couldn't find it in the docs.civicrm.org. I ran simi...Searching lab for:
- log hours
- time logging
- logging spent time
- record time
- record contributed hours
Reveals nothing. Google is not even pretending to be your friend either. I couldn't find it in the docs.civicrm.org. I ran similar searches on Mattermost, where i know the link has been posted numerous times and couldn't find it.
Out of desperation, I wrote this:
https://civicrm.stackexchange.com/questions/33589/how-can-i-log-hours-that-i-have-contributed-to-the-project/33590#33590
I don't know how to edit the wiki (I'm sure there's a page on that somewhere but searching "edit wiki" did not throw anything up and the only option seemed to suggest I clone and install gollom?!) but I'd like to suggest that adding some terms like the above to the page might make it easier for people to find the information via search :-)
Also (please say if this should be a ticket elsewhere) The tool at <https://civicrm.org/civicrm/timetrack/import#/import> needs some demystifying.
- In the examples, suggest using real options like `civi/doc` and `civi/dev` as examples instead of `alias/task1` and `alias/cat2` etc.
- I'd also suggest putting the whole list there for convenience, but OTOH it may be better to link to the wiki (as it currently does) in case it changes.
- Explain what `[!pi -s]` is and does.joshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/16Open technology fund - community protoype fund2019-10-28T12:59:20ZnicolOpen technology fund - community protoype fundCould this be a funding source for work on the new sustainable extensions ecosystem/directory discussed at Summit19? https://www.opentech.fund/funds/community-prototype-fund/Could this be a funding source for work on the new sustainable extensions ecosystem/directory discussed at Summit19? https://www.opentech.fund/funds/community-prototype-fund/https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/15Open Technology Fund - core infrastrucutre grants2019-10-28T12:57:34ZnicolOpen Technology Fund - core infrastrucutre grantsThese folk came highly recommended by a couple of people at Mozfest. A bunch of awards - [this one](https://www.opentech.fund/funds/core-infrastructure-fund/) closes this Friday but will have other rounds.These folk came highly recommended by a couple of people at Mozfest. A bunch of awards - [this one](https://www.opentech.fund/funds/core-infrastructure-fund/) closes this Friday but will have other rounds.2019-11-01https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/14Annual Report2020-01-26T20:11:29Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgAnnual ReportDevelop an annual report for the CiviCRM community to demonstrate health of project. Report could highlight:
- Previous year achievements
- Near term objectives
- Financials
- Community Summit 2020
- Contributors
- GSoC
- Project summar...Develop an annual report for the CiviCRM community to demonstrate health of project. Report could highlight:
- Previous year achievements
- Near term objectives
- Financials
- Community Summit 2020
- Contributors
- GSoC
- Project summary, working group structure, how to get involvedjoshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.org2020-01-15https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/13Pursue b corp certification2021-04-02T08:53:37Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgPursue b corp certificationSeveral years ago CiviCRM LLC researched modifying its legal structure and ultimated settled on adopting a b-corp certification. Need to research the requirements to complete this item.Several years ago CiviCRM LLC researched modifying its legal structure and ultimated settled on adopting a b-corp certification. Need to research the requirements to complete this item.joshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/uk/-/issues/2Summit 2020 - UK-bound - pre-planning thread.2019-10-21T10:04:16ZnicolSummit 2020 - UK-bound - pre-planning thread.[Re: issues/1#comment](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/events/community-summit-2020/issues/1#note_25317) a discussion thread for pre-planning CiviCRM summit 2020 UK (ie agreeing location, date & organising team). Once the wider communi...[Re: issues/1#comment](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/events/community-summit-2020/issues/1#note_25317) a discussion thread for pre-planning CiviCRM summit 2020 UK (ie agreeing location, date & organising team). Once the wider community has agreed with the plan, then future discussions can [continue in the 2020 sub-project](https://lab.civicrm.org/marketing/events/community-summit-2020/issues).