Community issueshttps://lab.civicrm.org/groups/community/-/issues2019-10-13T18:19:34Zhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/7Sign up for Auth.net partner program2019-10-13T18:19:34Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgSign up for Auth.net partner programjoshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/7Proposal - CiviCRM contact checksum expires is too short and users receive no...2020-09-17T09:42:29Zjustinfreeman (Agileware)Proposal - CiviCRM contact checksum expires is too short and users receive no feedback when a CiviCRM URL has an expired checksum token**Background**
User receives no feedback when clicking on a CiviCRM URL with an expired contact checksum token. CiviCRM will display the CiviCRM page without "logging in" the user and no notice.
If a membership reminder is sent to a us...**Background**
User receives no feedback when clicking on a CiviCRM URL with an expired contact checksum token. CiviCRM will display the CiviCRM page without "logging in" the user and no notice.
If a membership reminder is sent to a user, they click on the link to go and renew on their membership page, then the membership page will display but without their contact and membership details loaded. The user then has to decide:
How do I login? This might not be obvious on the website or not enabled at all.
Do I complete the membership form anew? A new membership is created.
Do I just leave this system and go walk the dog instead - the membership can expire? Membership is lost.
Do I contact the organisation? Involve more people and wasting more time.
For the above, a similar process can happen for emails sent out for event registration, donation, profile updates etc.
Related to this problem is the default CiviCRM "Checksum Lifespan" (/civicrm/admin/setting/misc?reset=1) is defined as 7 days. This is far too short. This sets a time limit of 7 days for membership, event, donation etc. to be completed. If it's 8 days, that's too late - checksum expired! I think an improvement here is to also increase the default Checksum Lifespan to 30 days. So that CiviCRM provides the greatest opportunity for the targeted contacts to complete the transaction.
Agileware Ref: CIVICRM-800
**Proposed Solutions**
**Solution 1**: Expired Checksum: Display an informative message on the page if the user has opened a CiviCRM page using a URL with an expired contact checksum. Message could be: "The link used to access the website has expired. Please contact us to obtain a new link"
A PR for this solution 1 has been submitted, https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/12260
**Solution 2**: Default Checksum Lifespan: Change this to 30 days.
No PR for solution 2 has been submitted yet.
**Next Steps**
Let's discuss these problems and the different approaches that could be used to solve them. Then we can work on the relevant PRs and submit for approval.justinfreeman (Agileware)justinfreeman (Agileware)https://lab.civicrm.org/community/gsoc/-/issues/7Document GSoC mentor and admin processes2020-01-14T04:47:43Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgDocument GSoC mentor and admin processesIn order to facilitate continuity in the CiviCRM + GSoC effort (assuming admins and/or mentors will change from year to year), we need to document the processes and necessary steps to administer it.In order to facilitate continuity in the CiviCRM + GSoC effort (assuming admins and/or mentors will change from year to year), we need to document the processes and necessary steps to administer it.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/8Contribution Refunds2020-03-27T03:31:41ZmfuggleContribution RefundsIt would be helpful if refunds could be initiated in CivCRM and effect the Payment Gateway so that it is not necessary to deal with refunds in the Payment Gateway (eWay in our case) as well as CiviCRM.It would be helpful if refunds could be initiated in CivCRM and effect the Payment Gateway so that it is not necessary to deal with refunds in the Payment Gateway (eWay in our case) as well as CiviCRM.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/8Should we disassociate from iATS?2022-12-03T20:19:31ZJoe McLaughlinShould we disassociate from iATS?In light of PTP ending its relationship in 2017 with iATS, see [here](https://progressivetech.org/blog/2017/10/05/ptp-drops-iats/), should the CiviCRM project end its relationship with iATS? I think we should re-open a dialogue with iATS...In light of PTP ending its relationship in 2017 with iATS, see [here](https://progressivetech.org/blog/2017/10/05/ptp-drops-iats/), should the CiviCRM project end its relationship with iATS? I think we should re-open a dialogue with iATS, along these lines - ```"If iATS is going to refuse to process payments for 'pro abortion' groups (whatever that means), with that level of uncertainty for customers of CiviCRM being potentially cut off from payment processing, we're not sure the CiviCRM project and iATS can continue to have a relationship. Your thoughts are appreciated by [date]."```https://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/8Make checksum tokens easier to use2018-10-05T18:27:11ZStoobMake checksum tokens easier to usePosted from Stack Exchange as instructed.
https://civicrm.stackexchange.com/questions/26746/feature-request-make-checksum-tokens-easier-to-usePosted from Stack Exchange as instructed.
https://civicrm.stackexchange.com/questions/26746/feature-request-make-checksum-tokens-easier-to-usehttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/8Language/topic-specific support2020-05-04T14:27:15ZbgmLanguage/topic-specific supportWe currently have this space for region-specific discussion (mostly meetups):
https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region
I would be tempted to create projects such as:
* ~~Canada (where folks could post in English or French)~~
* France...We currently have this space for region-specific discussion (mostly meetups):
https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region
I would be tempted to create projects such as:
* ~~Canada (where folks could post in English or French)~~
* France or Francophonie
(I want to avoid creating spaces that will struggle to get critical mass, or which will have a fair amount of overlap, ex: Quebec)
edit: based on the discussion, I changed the proposal title from "region/language-specific support" to only "language-specific support".https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/9Contribution Partial Refunds2020-03-27T03:31:41ZmfuggleContribution Partial RefundsIt is not possible to make a partial refund without the use of a third party extension. It would be helpful to be able to make partial refunds in CiviCRM and have the refund take effect in the Payment Gateway.It is not possible to make a partial refund without the use of a third party extension. It would be helpful to be able to make partial refunds in CiviCRM and have the refund take effect in the Payment Gateway.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/gsoc/-/issues/8Regarding Multi currency memberships2021-03-30T18:23:03ZAmandeepKaurRegarding Multi currency membershipsHello, I've understood the task and I want to try my hand with the work.
Where can I find the form to start with?Hello, I've understood the task and I want to try my hand with the work.
Where can I find the form to start with?https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/9Should we create our own payment processor?2019-12-09T02:10:15ZJoe McLaughlinShould we create our own payment processor?Consider starting our own, non-profit payment processorConsider starting our own, non-profit payment processorhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/9Improve core search usability related to commas, space2019-07-21T17:06:29ZStoobImprove core search usability related to commas, spacehttps://civicrm.stackexchange.com/questions/26747/feature-request-make-search-more-forgiving-and-spaces-after-comma-and-non-primahttps://civicrm.stackexchange.com/questions/26747/feature-request-make-search-more-forgiving-and-spaces-after-comma-and-non-primahttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/9Gitlab digest2019-08-07T19:01:06ZJonGoldGitlab digestThis issue is to track discussion on a "Gitlab digest". The digest is a regularly-scheduled (weekly?) email that shows all issues on Gitlab that need further discussion before moving forward. This should hopefully fix a bottleneck in t...This issue is to track discussion on a "Gitlab digest". The digest is a regularly-scheduled (weekly?) email that shows all issues on Gitlab that need further discussion before moving forward. This should hopefully fix a bottleneck in the development process, and provide a concrete way for non-developers to engage with the direction of the software development. Nicolas has explored some of what's necessary to automate the creation of this digest.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/10Improvements to Soft Credits2020-03-27T03:31:41ZmfuggleImprovements to Soft CreditsIf one contact makes a payment for more than one other contact (e.g. a parent paying a membership fee for two or more children) the total value of the contribution shows against the parent. However the total amount also shows against eac...If one contact makes a payment for more than one other contact (e.g. a parent paying a membership fee for two or more children) the total value of the contribution shows against the parent. However the total amount also shows against each of the children as a soft credit. What needs to happen is that the total value should show against the parent but the individual membership fees, for example, should show as soft credits against the children.
For example assume a parent has two children and the membership fee for each child is $100. The parent would pay $200 and that is shown as a contribution against the parent's contact record. The soft credit against each child should be $100, however the soft credit against each child is $200.
This issue is a webform issue when integrated with CivCRM.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/gsoc/-/issues/9Contribution to the project: "Mailing list functionality"2021-03-30T18:19:55ZMAVIN-07Contribution to the project: "Mailing list functionality"Hi,
I am an undergraduate and wish to start contributing to CiviCRM. I found one of the listed projects very appealing i.e. **"Mailing list functionality"**. Can anyone please guide me, how to proceed with it?Hi,
I am an undergraduate and wish to start contributing to CiviCRM. I found one of the listed projects very appealing i.e. **"Mailing list functionality"**. Can anyone please guide me, how to proceed with it?https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/10CiviCRM partner recruitment and renewal2019-11-13T14:56:09Zjoshjosh@civicrm.orgCiviCRM partner recruitment and renewalThis is a placeholder issue for tracking time recruiting new partners, managing current partner info and requests as well as ensuring renewals.This is a placeholder issue for tracking time recruiting new partners, managing current partner info and requests as well as ensuring renewals.joshjosh@civicrm.orgjoshjosh@civicrm.orghttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/feature-request/-/issues/10Improving quality of participation in the "Feature Request Project2018-10-15T15:00:47Zginkgomzdginkgomzd@fastmail.comImproving quality of participation in the "Feature Request ProjectI was looking everywhere for a "Comment" button...
For thousands of years, many cultures across the globe have believed that "in the beginning, was the WORD". Names matter.
I think "Requests" is the wrong framing for this project. From ...I was looking everywhere for a "Comment" button...
For thousands of years, many cultures across the globe have believed that "in the beginning, was the WORD". Names matter.
I think "Requests" is the wrong framing for this project. From the guidelines, it seems that this is intended more for discussion, brainstorming, and fleshing-out new work on CiviCRM.
Feature Specifications? Feature Brainstorms?
I think there is an implicit bias and barrier to entry for participation in this project. It gives privilege to professionals skilled in requirements gathering AND/OR people with lots of time on their hands to wrangle community participation. Do we not want ideas to be promoted on merit, not only on the resources of the backers? Honest question. If we just want to facilitate those with resources... then I guess that's what we'll do.
I think there could be a lot of benefit to having a place to attract casual "requests". A good old suggestions box. In a past life, I was taught to treasure all customer feedback because for every complaint or compliment, there were 10 other customers who think the same and won't take the time to give you the feedback. If we create a place to catch that casual feedback, we could avoid having chaos in the space for delving deep into scoping of projects.https://lab.civicrm.org/community/community-engagement/-/issues/10Debian integration2022-06-13T01:10:29ZDmitry SmirnovDebian integrationThis ticket is to log Debian integration effort.This ticket is to log Debian integration effort.Dmitry SmirnovDmitry Smirnovhttps://lab.civicrm.org/community/region/melbourne-meetups/-/issues/11How to show relationships on the summary page?2020-03-27T03:31:41ZMickCHow to show relationships on the summary page?Is there an extension that can help do this?Is there an extension that can help do this?https://lab.civicrm.org/community/gsoc/-/issues/10Integrate Spoke Peer-to-Peer Texting2021-04-11T02:23:07ZashaIntegrate Spoke Peer-to-Peer TextingI would like to contribute for 'Integrate Spoke Peer-to-Peer Texting' project for this summer. In my understanding, we have to create an extension to integrate CiviCRM with Spoke. The org's contacts and their tags( eg: Volunteer) shoul...I would like to contribute for 'Integrate Spoke Peer-to-Peer Texting' project for this summer. In my understanding, we have to create an extension to integrate CiviCRM with Spoke. The org's contacts and their tags( eg: Volunteer) should be synchronize with Spoke. Can i know what does it mean by question and answer? does that mean the peer-to-peer texting?https://lab.civicrm.org/community/sustainability/-/issues/11HR / recruiting more talented tech people into the CiviCRM world2019-10-21T16:21:39ZMichael McAndrewHR / recruiting more talented tech people into the CiviCRM worldI'm keen to talk with people who are interested in / have experience with / have struggled with recruiting talented technical people into the CiviCRM world (as opposed to cannibalising the ones that are already here).
I'd like to explor...I'm keen to talk with people who are interested in / have experience with / have struggled with recruiting talented technical people into the CiviCRM world (as opposed to cannibalising the ones that are already here).
I'd like to explore how we can find more skilled and passionate developers to work with.
My personal interest comes from wanting to grow a CiviCRM consultancy but am happy to broaden the discussion out.