CiviCRM Core issueshttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues2023-06-23T17:54:22Zhttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/19disabled optionvalues are not shown in participant export2023-06-23T17:54:22ZJoostdisabled optionvalues are not shown in participant exporta participant field has a custom field containing option values. Participants choose one of these option values. The option value that the participants chose gets disabled after they chose it. In a participant export containing this cust...a participant field has a custom field containing option values. Participants choose one of these option values. The option value that the participants chose gets disabled after they chose it. In a participant export containing this custom field the participants who chose for the disabled option will have a blanc space in the table on that location. Expected is having the option they chose over there, all-tough it has been disabled, and isn't available to choose any more.
to recreate this on a demo site:
1. create a participant to the fall fundraiser dinner with a soup preference
1. go to custom fields and edit the food preference custom field
1. deactivate the soup selection you chose in step 1
1. find participants to the fall fundraiser dinner
1. select all participants and export them using 'select fields to export'
1. select the fields to export:
- individual - display name to find the person you gave the food selection to
- participant - food preference: soup selection the field we are interested in
1. open the exported file. The soup selection for the disabled field isn't in there. When there are participants who chose for a soup that is still active the soup selection is in there for themhttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/18log tables for CiviCRM Drupal Modules can cause WSODs after running upgrades ...2023-06-23T17:54:21Zseamusleelog tables for CiviCRM Drupal Modules can cause WSODs after running upgrades when re-calculatingAfter every upgrade if you have detailed logging enabled then the log_tables are recalculated and any differences fixed up. This is to ensure that the triggers on the log tables work fine.
There is an issue with CiviCRM drupal modules ...After every upgrade if you have detailed logging enabled then the log_tables are recalculated and any differences fixed up. This is to ensure that the triggers on the log tables work fine.
There is an issue with CiviCRM drupal modules and it comes down to a miss calculation between the create schema for the intitial log table v the compare differences function.
An example is
```sql
CREATE TABLE civicrm_member_roles_rules (
rule_id int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
rid int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
type_id int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
status_codes text NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (rule_id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=4 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
```
When the log table for that is created the AUTO_INCREMENT is correctly handled through https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/blob/master/CRM/Logging/Schema.php#L709 However when the schema diff code runs. We only exclude the column `id` https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/blob/master/CRM/Logging/Schema.php#L628 as we assume that the id column will always be the AUTO_INCREMENT column whereas in the member_roles_rules example the AUTO INCREMENT column is actually `role_id`seamusleeseamusleehttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/17Convert Campaign Interview Task to use Pseudoconstant and remove PHP notices2023-06-23T17:54:21Zmattwiremjw@mjwconsult.co.ukConvert Campaign Interview Task to use Pseudoconstant and remove PHP noticesRemove deprecated CRM_Core_OptionGroup and replace with CRM_Core_PseudoConstant. Fix PHP notices.
Ref: https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/11809Remove deprecated CRM_Core_OptionGroup and replace with CRM_Core_PseudoConstant. Fix PHP notices.
Ref: https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/11809https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/16Select "Enable multiple bulk email address for a contact", "hold_date" can no...2023-06-23T17:54:21ZLiyanaSelect "Enable multiple bulk email address for a contact", "hold_date" can not be updatedI have reported the bug at https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-20189, and now I'll explain why the error occours only if you assign true to the variable civimail_multiple_bulk_emails.
( $result = civicrm_api3('Setting', 'creat...I have reported the bug at https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-20189, and now I'll explain why the error occours only if you assign true to the variable civimail_multiple_bulk_emails.
( $result = civicrm_api3('Setting', 'create', array(
'civimail_multiple_bulk_emails' => 1,
));)
If civimail_multiple_bulk_emails is true, you have three options to select for "On Hold?" in your email edit block, see the file ".../CRM/Contact/Form/Edit/Email.php".
If you chose the "- select -", the value is "0", which data type String is, and in the function "holdEmail" (.../CRM/Core/BAO/Email.php) the condition "elseif ($email->on_hold == 'null')..." will not be filled, because a string '0' is not 'null'!
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open the page „Administer CiviCRM“ --> “CiviMail Component Settings”, and select the option “Enable multiple bulk email address for a contact”
2. Open a contact and set “on hold” to the email (i.g. select “On Hold Opt Out”), and check the hold_date with api, ), in my test the “hold_date” is “2017-02-22 09:27:56”, and “on_hold=2
3. On the page of contact, reset the “On Hold” and save it, and check the value with api, and the value of “on_hold” is 0, BUT the “hold_date” IS NOT CHANGED! The “hold_date” should be deleted, and set the current time for “reset_date”!
4. As a following error: the “hold_date” is the old one, not changed, if you set “on hold” to the email again (i.g. select “On Hold Bounce”). In my test the “hold_date” is still “2017-02-22 09:27:56”, and “on_hold=1https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/15Wrong parameter passing in LineItem.php2023-06-23T17:54:21ZjitendraWrong parameter passing in LineItem.phpFound an incorrect parameter supplied to getFieldValue() function in CRM/Price/BAO/LineItem.php.
Current Code from https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/blob/master/CRM/Price/BAO/LineItem.php#L458-
$membershipId = CRM_Core_DAO::g...Found an incorrect parameter supplied to getFieldValue() function in CRM/Price/BAO/LineItem.php.
Current Code from https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/blob/master/CRM/Price/BAO/LineItem.php#L458-
$membershipId = CRM_Core_DAO::getFieldValue('CRM_Member_DAO_MembershipPayment', 'contribution_id', $line['entity_id'], 'membership_id');
`getFieldValue()` accepts the following parameters which is not correctly fed in the above line
> * @param string $daoName
* Name of the DAO (Example: CRM_Contact_DAO_Contact to retrieve value from a contact).
> * @param int $searchValue
* Value of the column you want to search by.
> * @param string $returnColumn
* Name of the column you want to GET the value of.
> * @param string $searchColumn
* Name of the column you want to search by.
> * @param bool $force
* Skip use of the cache.https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/14Creating a relationship fails for an organization contact which has NULL valu...2023-06-23T17:54:21ZEvanCreating a relationship fails for an organization contact which has NULL values in start/end/join fields of a membershipWhen creating a relationship between an Individual and an Organizational contact, the relationship fails to be created and throws the following error if the Organizational contact record has a membership with NULL values in the start/end...When creating a relationship between an Individual and an Organizational contact, the relationship fails to be created and throws the following error if the Organizational contact record has a membership with NULL values in the start/end/join fields, such as might happen if a payment failed and the membership was created in a "Pending" state:
`unknown relationship create error The membership cannot be saved because the status cannot be calculated for start_date: null end_date null join_date null as at 2018-03-09 16:43:22`
What's odd is that I wouldn't expect the relationships to be dependent on a membership object, but for some reason it is? I did some testing on a client's sandbox site and found that any membership with NULL start/end/join dates will cause a Relationship creation to fail. I found that deleting the membership with NULL dates fixes the issue i.e. allows the relationship to be created, as does simply adding dates to the membership in question.
**Backtrace:**
`Mar 09 16:43:23 [info] $backTrace = #0 /var/www/example.org/htdocs/sites/all/modules/civicrm/CRM/Core/Error.php(456): CRM_Core_Error::backtrace("backTrace", TRUE)
#1 /var/www/example.org/htdocs/sites/all/modules/civicrm/CRM/Core/Invoke.php(55): CRM_Core_Error::handleUnhandledException(Object(CRM_Core_Exception))
#2 /var/www/example.org/htdocs/sites/all/modules/civicrm/drupal/civicrm.module(345): CRM_Core_Invoke::invoke((Array:4))
#3 [internal function](): civicrm_invoke("contact", "view", "rel")
#4 /var/www/example.org/htdocs/includes/menu.inc(350): call_user_func_array("civicrm_invoke", (Array:3))
#5 /var/www/example.org/htdocs/index.php(17): menu_execute_active_handler()
#6 {main}`
**NB:** I am unable to manually re-create this scenario on the demo site (I tried) as a start date is required when creating a membership.https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/12Improvement: for crmUiWizard-driven workflows, scroll back to top between steps2023-06-23T17:54:21ZginkgofjgImprovement: for crmUiWizard-driven workflows, scroll back to top between stepsSome "steps" in a wizard are fairly long and require scrolling to reach all the required fields. See the CiviMail wizard (civicrm/a/#/mailing) for example.
Differences in height between the steps can make clicking the buttons that contr...Some "steps" in a wizard are fairly long and require scrolling to reach all the required fields. See the CiviMail wizard (civicrm/a/#/mailing) for example.
Differences in height between the steps can make clicking the buttons that control the workflow (back, forward, etc.) at the bottom of the wizard a jarring experience. Sometimes the next step is significantly shorter than the previous one, and the user is left looking at white space. Sometimes the next step is very similar to the previous step, and it is unclear that anything occurred after the user's click because the user's view hasn't changed.
In any case, a better user experience would be to move the user to the top of the wizard at each transition.5.0.0ginkgofjgginkgofjghttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/11Email - send now error screen should display earlier2023-06-23T17:54:21ZJchesterEmail - send now error screen should display earlierIn Advanced Search if you are displaying results as contacts and then:
* select more than 50 of the results
* select **Email - send now (to 50 or less)**
you see the Error message telling you that you can't email more than 50 contac...In Advanced Search if you are displaying results as contacts and then:
* select more than 50 of the results
* select **Email - send now (to 50 or less)**
you see the Error message telling you that you can't email more than 50 contacts this way and the process stops
However, if you display the results as contributions or as memberships then
* select more than 50 of the results
* select **Email - send now (to 50 or less)**
you are taken to the email set up page. It is not until you click on Send Email on that page that you see the Error message telling you that you can't email more than 50 contacts this way and the process is stopped.
It would be a better user experience if the error message always appeared when **Email - send now (to 50 or less)** was selected.5.9https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/10Enabling plugin in CKEditor Default doesn't enable it in Civimail despite sho...2023-06-23T17:54:21Zluke.stewartEnabling plugin in CKEditor Default doesn't enable it in Civimail despite showing it as enabledWhen enabling a CKEditor plugin at: civicrm/admin/ckeditor if you add it to "Default" and press save.
At this point the plugin shows up on all three tabs, (Default, Civimail, CiviEvent) however the plugin doesn't appear on a new mail des...When enabling a CKEditor plugin at: civicrm/admin/ckeditor if you add it to "Default" and press save.
At this point the plugin shows up on all three tabs, (Default, Civimail, CiviEvent) however the plugin doesn't appear on a new mail despite clearing caches, and force refreshing the browser.
Navigating to the "Civimail" tab and pressing save there as well gives the desired behaviour that the plugin is enabled.![CKEditor](/uploads/5c8b21a886fbf4b0eb27cd0a0ba0d09d/CKEditor.png)
Tested on 4.7.27 and 4.7.31RC
To reproduce:
1. Navigate to civicrm/admin/ckeditor
1. Select a plugin from the plugin dropdown on the default tab
1. Obeserve additional component appears in preview
1. Click Save
1. Clear caches civicrm/admin/setting/updateConfigBackend
1. Create an new email -> civicrm/mailing/send?reset=1
1. Observe additional component that it doesn't show in the toolbar.
1. Return to civicrm/admin/ckeditor
1. Shift to the Civi mail tab. Observe the plugin is listed.
1. Scratch head.
1. Press save.
1. Create a new mail.
1. You now have the required plugin.
I haven't tested behaviour with regards to the event tab.https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/9Custom include/exclude search is broken2023-06-23T17:54:21ZJchesterCustom include/exclude search is brokenToday (8 March 2018) on http://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org the custom include/exclude search gives a WSOD.
This was using **Include** Newsletter Subscribers and **exclude** Advisory Board.
This works correclty in 4.7.29 on Civihostings...Today (8 March 2018) on http://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org the custom include/exclude search gives a WSOD.
This was using **Include** Newsletter Subscribers and **exclude** Advisory Board.
This works correclty in 4.7.29 on Civihostings demo site. I don't have access to a 4.7.30 site to test on thathttps://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/8Fatal error on Print/Merge Document for Cases2023-06-23T17:54:21Zaydunsaidan.saunders@squiffle.ukFatal error on Print/Merge Document for Cases* Go to Search Cases
* Select cases
* Select Print/merge Document from Actions menu
* Result is fatal error
Possibly related to https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-21382
Reproduced on dmaster.demo
```
Array
(
[callback] =>...* Go to Search Cases
* Select cases
* Select Print/merge Document from Actions menu
* Result is fatal error
Possibly related to https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-21382
Reproduced on dmaster.demo
```
Array
(
[callback] => Array
(
[0] => CRM_Core_Error
[1] => handle
)
[code] => -19
[message] => DB Error: no such field
[mode] => 16
[debug_info] =>
SELECT contact_id
FROM civicrm_case
WHERE id IN ( 1,4 )
[nativecode=1054 ** Unknown column 'contact_id' in 'field list']
[type] => DB_Error
[user_info] =>
SELECT contact_id
FROM civicrm_case
WHERE id IN ( 1,4 )
[nativecode=1054 ** Unknown column 'contact_id' in 'field list']
[to_string] => [db_error: message="DB Error: no such field" code=-19 mode=callback callback=CRM_Core_Error::handle prefix="" info="
SELECT contact_id
FROM civicrm_case
WHERE id IN ( 1,4 )
[nativecode=1054 ** Unknown column 'contact_id' in 'field list']"]
)
```5.0.0https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/7recurring authorize IPN results in contribution with incorrect payment_instru...2023-06-23T17:54:21Zjamierecurring authorize IPN results in contribution with incorrect payment_instrument_idIf you create a recurring contribution in authorize.net, the second time it goes through, it will result in a contribution with payment instrument type set to check, instead of credit card (or perhaps a different value if you have a diff...If you create a recurring contribution in authorize.net, the second time it goes through, it will result in a contribution with payment instrument type set to check, instead of credit card (or perhaps a different value if you have a different default payment instrument id).
This seems related to this issue: https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-19186 which fixed it for paypal but not for authorize.net.https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/6Add help text for "is public" setting on form to edit custom field sets2023-06-23T17:54:21ZSean ColsenAdd help text for "is public" setting on form to edit custom field setsThere's a new setting for making custom field sets public/private. I think it needs some help text.
![mockup](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42411/36987279-f763aae0-2069-11e8-99c8-b3dd9953a895.png)
How exactly does CiviCRM c...There's a new setting for making custom field sets public/private. I think it needs some help text.
![mockup](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42411/36987279-f763aae0-2069-11e8-99c8-b3dd9953a895.png)
How exactly does CiviCRM change its behavior based on this setting?
As far as I can tell, this setting has only two effects:
* Custom fields attached directly to *events* are hidden from the event info page if they are part of a private custom field set
* from https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/10028
* Custom fields attached to some other entities (e.g. participation, contribution, etc... *not sure of comprehensive list*) are displayed in the registration email sent to participants, but only when this email comes from a back-office registration. These fields will be hidden if they're part of a private set.
* from https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/106615.8https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2331Ordering events by start date ignores time2023-06-23T05:03:21ZalainbOrdering events by start date ignores timeIn the Manage Events screen, when you click on the "Starts" column to sort events by start date/time, the events are sorted by date but not by time.
You can reproduce the error by creating multiple events with the same start date, but d...In the Manage Events screen, when you click on the "Starts" column to sort events by start date/time, the events are sorted by date but not by time.
You can reproduce the error by creating multiple events with the same start date, but different start times. See screenshot.
![events-not-properly-ordered-by-date-time](/uploads/008ec03f8e16bc81c1e0bec60ca02520/events-not-properly-ordered-by-date-time.png)
(I discovered this in 5.28.4, but you can reproduce it in the demo environment. Currently 5.35.alpha1)https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2375Feature request, De-duplicate rules for Organisations would be more useful if...2023-06-23T05:03:20Zjustinfreeman (Agileware)Feature request, De-duplicate rules for Organisations would be more useful if Organisation Nickname was a multi-value fieldDe-duplicate rules for Organisations would be more useful if Organisation Nickname was a multi-value field. Thereby allowing multiple Nicknames (or aliases) for the same organisation to be recorded.
Currently de-duplicate rules for Orga...De-duplicate rules for Organisations would be more useful if Organisation Nickname was a multi-value field. Thereby allowing multiple Nicknames (or aliases) for the same organisation to be recorded.
Currently de-duplicate rules for Organisations are limited by up to 5 fields. So if you have Organisation Name, Nickname and Email then there are only two fields remaining to compare, which could be used for two custom (Organisation) Nickname fields. You could possibly have a multi-valued custom field for Nickname 2 - have not confirmed if that works at all for de-duplication.
However, it is more commonplace for Organisations to have multiple different abbreviations and shortened versions, not by some "official" naming standard, but simply because people refer to the Organisation differently with varying spelling and abbreviations. eg. IBM, I.B.M, IBM Inc. IBM Intl.
This is a feature request. Open for discussion about other solutions or implementation.
Agileware Ref: CIVICRM-1666https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/1912Weird "null" in mailing recipient group list2023-06-23T03:51:55ZDaveDWeird "null" in mailing recipient group list![null](/uploads/0c8e6691c31580ceb2cc621df015fe93/null.png)
Can reproduce on dmaster.demo. I don't see it in 5.22 but do see it in 5.24 and up. Don't have a 5.23 handy.
1. Create at least 2 groups with the mailing list checkbox checked...![null](/uploads/0c8e6691c31580ceb2cc621df015fe93/null.png)
Can reproduce on dmaster.demo. I don't see it in 5.22 but do see it in 5.24 and up. Don't have a 5.23 handy.
1. Create at least 2 groups with the mailing list checkbox checked.
1. Go to New Mailing.
1. Pick one group.
1. Open the group dropdown again and scroll down.
1. It even lets you select it.
In drupal watchdog there is this:
`Location: http://example.com/civicrm/ajax/rest?entity=Mailing&action=getlist&json=%7B%22input%22%3A%22%22%2C%22page_num%22%3A1%2C%22params%22%3A%7B%22is_hidden%22%3A0%2C%22is_active%22%3A1%2C%22options%22%3A%7B%22sort%22%3A%22is_archived+asc%2C+scheduled_date+desc%22%7D%7D%2C%22api.MailingRecipients.getcount%22%3A%7B%7D%7D`
`Notice: Undefined index: name in _civicrm_api3_generic_getlist_output() (line 191 of .../api/v3/Generic/Getlist.php).`
This might be violating a higher mathematical law here too - it's not possible to exclude the null set, since the null set is a subset of every set. (Source: Math)5.64.0https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4319SearchKit + FormBuilder: In place edit using a list view2023-06-22T14:15:45Zsimon.hermannSearchKit + FormBuilder: In place edit using a list viewOverview
----------------------------------------
I was trying to embed a list view of a SearchKit in FormBuilder, where some of the entries have 'in-place edit' activated. When looking at the Afform I am able to click on those entries a...Overview
----------------------------------------
I was trying to embed a list view of a SearchKit in FormBuilder, where some of the entries have 'in-place edit' activated. When looking at the Afform I am able to click on those entries and the the green checkmark as well as the red X appear, however I am not able to edit the content of the entry.
Reproduction steps
----------------------------------------
1. Create a SearchKit with a list view
1. Activate the option 'in-place edit' for some of the entries.
1. Embed the list view in a Afform.
Current behaviour
----------------------------------------
The entries with 'in-place edit' are clickable and the green checkmark as well as the red X are showing. However, the input is shown but cannot be altered.
Expected behaviour
----------------------------------------
The input is shown and I can edit it.
Environment information
----------------------------------------
* __CiviCRM:__ 5.58.1 and 5.60
* __PHP:__ 7.4 and 8.1
* __CMS:__ WordPress 6.1.3https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2373Membership Details report, Net Amount returns null value instead of the most ...2023-06-22T05:03:29Zjustinfreeman (Agileware)Membership Details report, Net Amount returns null value instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewalMembership Details report, Net Amount returns null value instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewal
Steps to reproduce
1. Locate an existing Contact with a membership, eg. "Dr. Jacob Terrell-Terry Sr." https://dm...Membership Details report, Net Amount returns null value instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewal
Steps to reproduce
1. Locate an existing Contact with a membership, eg. "Dr. Jacob Terrell-Terry Sr." https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/contact/view?reset=1&cid=33
2. Renew the membership and enter in a contribution amount, $150
3. Save the contribution
4. Open the Membership Details report, https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/report/instance/23
5. Display column: Net Amount
6. Set Contact filter to locate the contact, eg. Terrell
7. Report displays null value for Net Amount column
8. Expected result is Net Value shows $150
As verified on CiviCRM 5.36.alpha1 - https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org
Agileware Ref: CIVICRM-1663
![Screenshot_20210209_150213](/uploads/862ae11ddee4eb3319584e94295c1eba/Screenshot_20210209_150213.png)
![screencapture-dmaster-demo-civicrm-org-civicrm-report-instance-23-2021-02-09-15_05_16](/uploads/04b31b801b212d1777de30036d0cec3e/screencapture-dmaster-demo-civicrm-org-civicrm-report-instance-23-2021-02-09-15_05_16.png)https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2374Membership Details report, "Payment Amount (most recent)" returns total amoun...2023-06-22T05:03:29Zjustinfreeman (Agileware)Membership Details report, "Payment Amount (most recent)" returns total amount for all membership contributions instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewalMembership Details report, "Payment Amount (most recent)" returns total amount for all membership contributions instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewal.
Steps to reproduce
1. Locate an existing Contact with a ...Membership Details report, "Payment Amount (most recent)" returns total amount for all membership contributions instead of the most recent Contribution for the Membership renewal.
Steps to reproduce
1. Locate an existing Contact with a membership, eg. "Dr. Jacob Terrell-Terry Sr." https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/contact/view?reset=1&cid=33
2. Renew the membership and enter in a contribution amount, $150
3. Save the contribution
4. Open the Membership Details report, https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/report/instance/23
5. Display column: "Payment Amount (most recent)"
6. Set Contact filter to locate the contact, eg. Terrell
7. Report displays $250 value for "Payment Amount (most recent)" column
8. Expected result is "Payment Amount (most recent)" shows $150 (not the combined total)
It is also confusing to label the column "Payment Amount (most recent)" and then in the results show the column as "Amount".
As verified on CiviCRM 5.36.alpha1 - https://dmaster.demo.civicrm.org
Agileware Ref: CIVICRM-1664
![Screenshot_20210209_150213](/uploads/e07371ce892ad94af4a09ab08feacd11/Screenshot_20210209_150213.png)
![screencapture-dmaster-demo-civicrm-org-civicrm-report-instance-23-2021-02-09-15_05_16](/uploads/e6ddeaa2622029cf9cb272acac074a34/screencapture-dmaster-demo-civicrm-org-civicrm-report-instance-23-2021-02-09-15_05_16.png)https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2367Possible wp regression on package having git repo2023-06-21T05:03:20ZeileenPossible wp regression on package having git repoI just downloaded , unzipped & commited the wp 5.34.0 release and found that it committed the following as a submodule - implying we are shipping with the .git folder
civicrm/vendor/pear/validate_finance_creditcard
I had deleted the fo...I just downloaded , unzipped & commited the wp 5.34.0 release and found that it committed the following as a submodule - implying we are shipping with the .git folder
civicrm/vendor/pear/validate_finance_creditcard
I had deleted the folder before unzipping so it was not pre-existing.
This could cause issues for people who use git in their deployment workflow
I have not checked other CMS
@totten @seamuslee