From dcc9dd627e379b603a61bb5c5aa9a3b46d60c76a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Otten <totten@civicrm.org> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:02:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] standards/review - Prefer the DEL template over MC The DEL workflow produces more readable output. --- docs/standards/review.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/standards/review.md b/docs/standards/review.md index 33ad5811..eebd575b 100644 --- a/docs/standards/review.md +++ b/docs/standards/review.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ write a long, bespoke blurb. You may conduct a structured review, checking each standard in turn. Doing this will be easier if you copy a template and paste it into your Github comment. -* When conducting your first or second structured review, copy [template-mc-1.0.md](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civicrm/civicrm-dev-docs/master/docs/standards/review/template-mc-1.0.md). It provides several examples. +* When conducting your first or second structured review, copy [template-del-1.0.md](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civicrm/civicrm-dev-docs/master/docs/standards/review/template-del-1.0.md) or [template-mc-1.0.md](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civicrm/civicrm-dev-docs/master/docs/standards/review/template-mc-1.0.md). It provides several examples. * Once you're familiar with the criteria, copy [template-word-1.0.md](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civicrm/civicrm-dev-docs/master/docs/standards/review/template-word-1.0.md). It's a bit shorter and quicker. ## Common standards -- GitLab